|Table of Contents|

Study on the Difference of Mine Geo-environmental Problem Response to Mineral Resource Exploitation:a Case Study About the Mining Areas in Tongguan and Daliuta of Shaanxi and Fuxin of Liaoning(PDF)

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

Issue:
2011年第01期
Page:
89-94,100
Research Field:
水资源与环境
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on the Difference of Mine Geo-environmental Problem Response to Mineral Resource Exploitation:a Case Study About the Mining Areas in Tongguan and Daliuta of Shaanxi and Fuxin of Liaoning
Author(s):
XU You-ning12XU Dong-yin2ZHANG Jiang-hua1CHEN Hua-qing12
1. Xi'an Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China; 2. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China
Keywords:
mine geo-environment difference factor Tongguan Daliuta Fuxin mining area
PACS:
X141
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Taking the mining area in Tongguan and Daliuta of Shaanxi and Fuxin of Liaoning as an example, the difference of mine geo-environmental problem response to mineral resource exploration and its main factors were discussed by the means of the comparative analysis. The main geo-environmental problems caused by mineral resource exploration in the above three mining areas included as follow: before the 1990s, the mineral resource exploration in Tongguan gold mining area of Shaanxi was very confused, a large amount of waste mining rock lead to severe debris flow and risk, the “three wastes”(i.e. waste gas, waste water and waste residues)discharged disorderly and caused serious heavy metal and cyanide pollutions for soil, river and its sediment, and seriously influenced the human health; Daliuta coal mining area of Shaanxi located at fragile eco-environment zone, twenty-year underground coal mining with heavy machinery caused serious surface collapse and aquifer destroy, but land desertification in the mining area reduced in trend, heavy metal pollutions of soil and water environments were light; for Fuxin coal mining area with one-hundred-year history, surface mining caused frequent landslides, serious land destroy and destruction, land collapse caused by underground exploration had a significant influence on the safety of human life and property, but heavy metal pollutions of soil and water environments were relatively light comparing with metal mining area. Compared with the mine geo-environmental problem of the above three mining areas, the main factors of the difference were mineral resource types, mine geo-environmental condition, exploration methods and environment protection conception.

References:

[1] 徐友宁,何 芳,陈社斌,等.矿山环境地质问题特点及类型划分[J].西北地质,2003,36(增):19-25.
[2] 寿嘉华.走绿色矿业之路——西部大开发矿产资源发展战略思考[J].中国地质,2000,27(12):2-3.
[3] 徐友宁.矿山地质环境调查研究现状及展望[J].地质通报,2008,27(8),1235-1244.
[4] 姜建军,刘建伟.中国矿山地质环境问题及其对策[J].西北地质,2003,36(增):1-5.
[5] 武 强,刘伏昌,李 铎.矿山环境研究理论与实践[M].北京:地质出版社,2005.
[6] 张进德,张作辰,刘建伟,等.我国矿山地质环境调查与研究 [M].北京:地质出版社,2009.
[7] 魏迎春,徐友宁.矿山地质环境量化评价模型研究[J].华南地质与矿产,2004(4):47-50.
[8] 何 芳,徐友宁,袁汉春.矿山环境地质问题综合评价客观权值确定方法探讨[J].中国地质,2008,35(2):337-343.
[9] 汤中立,李小虎,焦建刚,等.矿山地质环境问题及防治对策[J].地球科学与环境学报,2005,27(2):1-4.
[10] 王俊桃,谢 娟,张益谦.矿山废石淋溶对水环境的影响[J].地球科学与环境学报,2006,28(4):92-96.
[11] 虎维岳,周建军,闫兰英.废弃矿井水位回弹诱致环境与安全灾害分析[J].西安科技大学学报,2010,30(4):436-440.
[12] 西安地质矿产研究所.重点矿山地质环境问题专题调查综合研究报告[R].西安:西安地质矿产研究所,2007.
[13] 西安地质矿产研究所.陕西潼关金矿区地质环境问题专题调查报告[R].西安:西安地质矿产研究所,2009.
[14] 西安地质矿产研究所.陕西大柳塔煤矿区地质环境问题专题调查报告[R].西安:西安地质矿产研究所,2007.
[15] 辽宁省地质矿产调查院.辽宁阜新煤矿区地质环境问题专题调查报告[R].沈阳:辽宁省地质矿产调查院,2007.
[16] 刘世建,谢 洪,韦方强,等.小秦岭金矿区人为泥石流[J].山地学报,1996,14(4):259-263.
[17] 徐友宁,陈社斌,何 芳,等.潼关金矿区矿渣型泥石流灾害及防治对策[J].山地学报,2006,24(6):667-671.
[18] GB 15618-1995,土壤环境质量标准[S].
[19] 徐友宁,张江华,陈社斌,等.小秦岭金矿区不同污染方式土壤剖面上重金属含量分布特征[J].农业环境科学学报,2008,27(1):200-206.
[20] 徐友宁,陈社斌,陈华清.生态环境脆弱区煤炭资源开发诱发的环境地质问题——以陕西省神木县大柳塔煤矿区为例[J].地质通报,2008,27(8):1344-1350.
[21] 李智佩,徐友宁,郭 莉,等.陕北现代化煤炭开采区土地沙漠化影响及原因——以大柳塔—活鸡兔矿区为例[J].地球科学与环境学报,2010,32(4):398-403.
[22] 徐友宁,陈社斌,陈华清,等.大柳塔煤矿开发土壤重金属污染响应研究[J].中国矿业,2007,16(7):47-50.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2011-03-20