|Table of Contents|

Comparison with GIS Product Quality Evaluation Methods Based Fuzzy Set and Defection Subtraction Score(PDF)

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

Issue:
2006年第02期
Page:
96-99
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison with GIS Product Quality Evaluation Methods Based Fuzzy Set and Defection Subtraction Score
Author(s):
HU Sheng-wu; WANG Hong-tao
Department of Surveying Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454100, Henan, China
Keywords:
GIS product;  quality evaluation;  fuzzy set;  defection subtraction method;  compare
PACS:
P208
DOI:
-
Abstract:
This paper researches on evaluation of GIS product quality; adopts fuzzy set method and defection sub- traction score method to compare with GIS product quality evaluation methods based fuzzy set and defection sub- traction scores, and mainly processes with three factors that are theory,approach and property, then gives an ex- ample to analyze the results. It is pointed out that fuzzy set method is superior to the defection subtraction score method. It is found that it the fuzzy uncertainty must be considered to make clear GIS product quality when evalu- ating GIS product quality.

References:

[1] 王庆国. 4D 产品 质量的 模糊 综合评 判[D] . 武汉 :武汉 大学， 2004.
[2] 王新洲，史文中，王树 良. 模糊空 间信息处 理[M] . 武汉 :武汉 大学出版社，2004.
[3] 刘 春. GIS 属性数据的 精度度量 及质量 控制的 抽样原 理与 方法[D] . 上海 :同济大学，2000.
[4] 李大军，龚健雅，谢刚生. DLG 产品质量 的模糊综 合评判[J] . 地矿测绘，2002，18(1):1 3.
[5] 刘大杰，史文中，童小华 ,等. GIS 空 间数据的精度 分析与质量 控制[M] . 上海 :上海科学技术文献出版社, 1999.
[6] 陈 能. 城市工程地质 GIS 理论与 实践 ———以大庆市 东城区 为例[D] . 上海 :同济大学，2001.
[7] 胡圣武，王新洲，李长春. 基于梯形模糊数GIS 产品的可靠性 分析[J] . 地球科学与环境学报，2005，27(3):88 90.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2006-06-20