|Table of Contents|

Scheme of Soil Erosion Control and Ecologic Measure Optimization in Hill and Mound Region - A Case Study of Gongqiao Waterside in Xuanhan County,Sichuan Province(PDF)

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

Issue:
2007年第03期
Page:
304-307,315
Research Field:
环境地学
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Scheme of Soil Erosion Control and Ecologic Measure Optimization in Hill and Mound Region - A Case Study of Gongqiao Waterside in Xuanhan County,Sichuan Province
Author(s):
LU Yu-dong1; ZHANG Shu-heng2; SONG Guang-y u3; HE Bing-hui3
1. School of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China; 2. Qinghai Investigation Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Xining 810008, Qinghai, China; 3. School of Resource and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
Keywords:
hill and mound region;  soil erosion;  control scheme;  ecologic engineering;  measure optimization
PACS:
S157;X144
DOI:
-
Abstract:
On the basis of long term observation on runoff test site in Gongqiao waterside in Xuanhan County, Sichuan Province, this paper puts forward five soil control schemes considering ecologic effect. Applying multipurpose optimization method, the waterside has been divided into a series of ecologic regions according to ecologic conditions and soil control schemes. Moreover, the soil control measures in each ecologic region are optimized. After management, the waterside becomes an element of soil and water conservation system and agricultural product base, and people harmony with ecologic element. The research result can offer a scheme for ecologic soil erosion control in the south China.

References:

[1] 张信宝,付仕祥. 长江上游 重点水土 流失区陡 坡耕地的 出路 [J] . 中国水土保持,1999(9):38-39.
[2] 杨子生. 长江上游滇东北山区坡耕地水土流失与 可持续利用 研究简介[J] . 山地学报,1999,17(增刊):1-5.
[3] 杨子生. 滇东 北山区 坡耕 地土 壤侵蚀 的水 土保 持措 施因子 [J] . 山地学报,1999,17(增刊):22-24.
[4] 李双喜,刘绍之. 长江流 域试点小 流域治 理模式 及成效[J] . 中国水土保持,1999(9):42-43.
[5] 许 峰,蔡 强 国. 等 高 植物 篱 在 南 方 湿 润 山 区 坡 地 的应 用 ———以三峡库区紫 色土坡 地为例[J] . 山地学 报,1999,17 (3):193-199.
[6] 蔡强国,黎四龙. 植物篱 减少侵蚀 的原因 分析[J] . 土 壤侵蚀 与水土保持学报,1999,4(2):54-60.
[7] 施 迅. 坡地改良利用中活篱笆的种类选择 和水平空间结构 的初步研究[J] . 生态农业研究,1995,3(2):49-53.
[8] 赵艺学. 晋西沟坝地 —梯田 —坡耕地农业效应的比较[J] . 水 土保持学报,2000,14(2):75-78.
[9] 包维楷,陈庆恒. 退化山 地生态系 统恢复和 重建问题 的探讨 [J] . 山地学报,1999,17(1):22-27.
[10] 杨 武德,王兆骞,眭 国平,等. 红壤 坡地不同利用方 式土壤侵 蚀模型研 究[J] . 土 壤侵 蚀 与 水 土 保持 学 报,1999,5(1): 52-58.
[11] 石 培 礼,唐 亚. 山 地 农 业 生 态 系 统 持 续发 展 的 有 效 途 径 ———坡地农业技 术(SALT)[J] . 生 态 农 业 研究,1996,4 (2):44-49.
[12] Gilley J E,Egbball B. Narrow Grass Hedge Ef f ects on Runoff and Soil Loss[J] . Jou rn al of Soil and Wat er C onservati on,1999,55(2):190-196.
[13] 宋桂琴,李领涛. 王东 沟农业生 态系统能 流分析[J] . 水 土保 持学报,1995,9(2):58-63.
[14] Koes er H. Management of M at eri al and Energy Fl ow s f orm an En vi ronmen t Perspecti ve w ith Methods of Ecobalance[J] . Chemische T ech nik,1998,50(4):1-2.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 1900-01-01