|Table of Contents|

Evaluation of Land Use Performance in Ningxia, China Based on Entropy-weight TOPSIS Model and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Factors(PDF)

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

Issue:
2023年第04期
Page:
796-805
Research Field:
环境与可持续发展专刊
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation of Land Use Performance in Ningxia, China Based on Entropy-weight TOPSIS Model and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Factors
Author(s):
YANG Zhi1;  LI Cai-wen2;  REN Zheng-yan1;  LI Peng3; 4*;  XU Yao-tao3;  HAN Jian-chun3;  PEI Lei3
(1. Ningxia Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Station, Yinchuan 750002, Ningxia, China; 2. Northwest Surveying, Planning and Designing Institute of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xi'an 710048, Shaanxi, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, Shaanxi, China; 4. Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Ecological Hydrology and Disaster Prevention in Arid Regions, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
land use performance;  entropy-weight TOPSIS model;  coupling coordination degree;  obstacle degree;  ecology performance;  security performance;  Ningxia
PACS:
X24
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Regional land use performance evaluation is an effective means to improve its sustainable development capacity. The entropy-weight TOPSIS model, coupling coordination degree model and obstacle degree model were used to evaluate the dynamic changes of land use performance, coordinated development level and obstacle factors in Ningxia in the last 14 years(2006-2019)by selecting a total of 17 indicators from four aspects, including economy, society, ecology and security. The results show that from 2006 to 2011, land use performance of Ningxia is at a poor level; from 2012 to 2017, with the accelerated industrialization and urbanization, the level of land use performance rises rapidly and is at a high-quality level; from 2018 to 2019, with the emergence of ecological and land security issues, land use performance of Ningxia drops to an intermediate level. The average annual growth of economy performance is 6.16%; society performance has generally increased steadily over 14 years, showing obvious periodical characteristics; ecology performance falls back to intermediate level in 2019; and security performance has been at intermediate level from 2015 to 2019. Land use economy-society-ecology-security performances coupling coordination degree increases from moderate disorder in 2006 to intermediate coordination in 2019. From 2016 to 2019, the main obstacle factors affecting land use performance in Ningxia are the proportion of investment in water, environment and public facilities, the proportion of ecological land area, the comprehensive utilization rate of industrial solid waste, the degree of land coordination and the ratio of agricultural land area/construction land area.

References:

[1] 傅伯杰,陈利顶,马 诚.土地可持续利用评价的指标体系与方法[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(2):112-118.
FU Bo-jie,CHEN Li-ding,MA Cheng.The Index Sy-stem and Method of Land Sustainable Use Evaluation[J].Journal of Natural Resources,1997,12(2):112-118.
[2] 韩 博,金晓斌,孙 瑞,等.基于冲突-适配视角的土地利用可持续性评价[J].地理学报,2021,76(7):1763-1777.
HAN Bo,JIN Xiao-bin,SUN Rui,et al.Land Use Su-stainability Evaluation Based on Conflict-adaptation Perspective[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2021,76(7):1763-1777.
[3] NAVARRO GARCIA J,MARCOS-MARTINEZ R,MOSNIER A,et al.Multi-target Scenario Discovery to Plan for Sustainable Food and Land Systems in Australia[J].Sustainability Science,2023,18(1):371-388.
[4] 雷勋平,QIU R B,刘 勇.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的区域土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(13):243-253.
LEI Xun-ping,QIU R B,LIU Yong.Evaluation of Regional Land Use Performance Based on Entropy TOPSIS Model and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Factors[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(13):243-253.
[5] 李春燕,南 灵.陕西省土地生态安全动态评价及障碍因子诊断[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(4):72-81.
LI Chun-yan,NAN Ling.Dynamic Evaluation and Ob-stacle Factor Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors on Land Eco-security in Shaanxi Province[J].China Land Science,2015,29(4):72-81.
[6] 徐维祥,徐志雄,刘程军.黄河流域地级城市土地集约利用效率与生态福利绩效的耦合性分析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(1):114-130.
XU Wei-xiang,XU Zhi-xiong,LIU Cheng-jun.Coupl-ing Analysis of Land Intensive Use Efficiency and Ecological Well-being Performance of Cities in the Yellow River Basin[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2021,36(1):114-130.
[7] 张蚌蚌,郭 芬,黄 丹,等.陕北“一户一田”和“一组一田”耕地细碎化整治模式与绩效评价[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(15):28-36.
ZHANG Bang-bang,GUO Fen,HUANG Dan,et al.Pattern and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Model for “One Household One Plot” and “One Village One Plot” to Solve Land Fragmentation in Northern Shaanxi Province,China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(15):28-36.
[8] YANG B,WANG Z Q,YAO X W,et al.Assessing the Performance of Land Consolidation Projects in Different Modes:A Case Study in Jianghan Plain of Hubei Province,China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2020,17(4):1410.
[9] CHAN E H W,WANG A Q,LANG W.Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Sustainable Land Use:Case Study of Hong Kong in 2000-2010[J].Journal of Urban Planning and Development,2016,142(4):0000346.
[10] 王 晶,齐 伟,王 鑫,等.基于生态服务能力的土地利用景观空间绩效评价方法[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(增2):32-35.
WANG Jing,QI Wei,WANG Xin,et al.Evaluation Method of Landscape Space Performance Based on Ecological Service Ability[J].China Population,Resources and Environment,2017,27(S2):32-35.
[11] 孙奇奇,宋 戈,齐美玲.基于主成分分析的哈尔滨市土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(1):234-238.
SUN Qi-qi,SONG Ge,QI Mei-ling.Analysis of Land Ecological Safety Evaluation of Harbin City Based on Principal Component Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(1):234-238.
[12] 黄 硕,成林莉,董建文,等.基于GIS与AHP法的城市山地公园复愈性环境影响机制研究[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(4):233-240.
HUANG Shuo,CHENG Lin-li,DONG Jian-wen,et al.Environmental Impact Mechanism of Urban Mountain Park Restoration Landscape Based on GIS and AHP[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2021,36(4):233-240.
[13] 康秀琴.基于AHP法的桂林市8个公园绿地植物景观评价[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(6):273-278.
KANG Xiu-qin.Evaluation on Plantscape of Eight Parks in Guilin by AHP Method[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University,2018,33(6):273-278.
[14] 李 灿,张凤荣,朱泰峰,等.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(5):217-227.
LI Can,ZHANG Feng-rong,ZHU Tai-feng,et al.Evaluation and Correlation Analysis of Land Use Performance Based on Entropy-weight TOPSIS Method[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2013,29(5):217-227.
[15] 石 丹,关婧文,刘吉平.基于DPSIR-EES模型的旅游型城镇生态安全评价研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(11):4330-4341.
SHI Dan,GUAN Jing-wen,LIU Ji-ping.Ecological Security Evaluation of Tourism Towns Based on DPSIR-EES-matter Element[J].Journal of Ecology,2021,41(11):4330-4341.
[16] 李子君,王 硕,马 良,等.基于熵权物元模型的沂蒙山区土地生态安全动态变化及其影响因素研究[J].土壤通报,2021,52(2):425-433.
LI Zi-jun,WANG Shuo,MA Liang,et al.Evaluation of Land Ecological Security and Influencing Factors in Yimeng Mountain Area Based on Entropy Weight Matter Element Model[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2021,52(2):425-433.
[17] 程 静,黄 越.宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动力[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):382-389.
CHENG Jing,HUANG Yue.Spatiotemporal Evolution of Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving For-ces in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(2):382-389.
[18] 杨名扬,冯 骁,徐 浩.宁夏能源消费的碳足迹研究[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(3):291-294.
YANG Ming-yang,FENG Xiao,XU Hao.Research on the Carbon Trace of Energy Consumption in Ningxia[J].Journal of Ningxia University(Natural Science Edition),2020,41(3):291-294.
[19] 杨光明,桂青青,陈 也,等.基于灰色关联理论的三峡库区2015～2019年生态安全时空演变特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(5):348-356.
YANG Guang-ming,GUI Qing-qing,CHEN Ye,et al.Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Ecological Security in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area During 2015-2019 Based on Grey Relational Theory[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,41(5):348-356.
[20] 郑华伟,夏梦蕾,张 锐,等.基于熵值法和灰色预测模型的耕地生态安全诊断[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(3):284-289.
ZHENG Hua-wei,XIA Meng-lei,ZHANG Rui,et al.Diagnosis on Ecological Security of Cultivated Land Based on Entropy Method and Grey Prediction Model[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,36(3):284-289.
[21] 洪惠坤,廖和平,李 涛,等.基于熵值法和Dagum基尼系数分解的乡村空间功能时空演变分析[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(10):240-248.
HONG Hui-kun,LIAO He-ping,LI Tao,et al.Analysis of Spatio-temporal Patterns of Rural Space Function Based on Entropy Value Method and Dagum Gini Coefficient[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(10):240-248.
[22] 赵 丽,朱永明,付梅臣,等.主成分分析法和熵值法在农村居民点集约利用评价中的比较[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(7):235-242.
ZHAO Li,ZHU Yong-ming,FU Mei-chen,et al.Comparative Study on Intensive Use of Rural Residential Land Based on Principal Component Analysis and Entropy Method[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2012,28(7):235-242.
[23] ALTURK B,KURC H C,KONUKCU F,et al.Multi-criteria Land Use Suitability Analysis for the Spatial Distribution of Cattle Farming Under Land Use Change Modeling Scenarios in Thrace Region,Turkey[J].Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2022,198:107063.
[24] 吴一凡,雷国平,路 昌,等.基于改进TOPSIS模型的大庆市城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度诊断[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):85-90.
WU Yi-fan,LEI Guo-ping,LU Chang,et al.Evaluation of Urban Land Use Performance Based on the Improved TOPSIS Model and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Degree in Daqing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(4):85-90.
[25] 蒋忙舟,杨 志,张晓明,等.基于DPSIR模型的西北五省区水安全评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2022,44(3):535-544.
JIANG Mang-zhou,YANG Zhi,ZHANG Xiao-ming,et al.Assessment of Water Security in Shaanxi,Gansu,Ningxia,Qinghai and Xinjiang,Northwest China Based on DPSIR Model[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2022,44(3):535-544.
[26] 罗文斌,吴次芳.农村土地整理项目绩效评价及影响因素定量分析[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(22):273-281.
LUO Wen-bin,WU Ci-fang.Quantitative Analysis of Performance Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Rural Land Consolidation Projects[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2014,30(22):273-281.
[27] 王 枫,汤沛銮.考虑区域发展阶段差异的城市建设用地多功能绩效评价:以珠三角城市群为例[J].中国土地科学,2020,34(12):87-95.
WANG Feng,TANG Pei-luan.Multi-function Perfor-mance Evaluation on Urban Construction Land Considering Regional Development Stage Differences:A Case Study on Urban Agglomeration in Pearl River Delta[J].China Land Science,2020,34(12):87-95.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-06-20