|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郝建斌,姚婕,黄毓挺,等.动力作用下锚杆格构支护土质边坡动态响应分析[J].地球科学与环境学报,2015,37(05):93-100.
　HAO Jian-bin,YAO Jie,HUANG Yu-ting,et al.Analysis of Dynamic Response of Soil Slope Reinforced by Anchors and Lattices Subjected to Dynamic Loads[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2015,37(05):93-100.
点击复制

动力作用下锚杆格构支护土质边坡动态响应分析(PDF)
分享到：

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

卷:
第37卷
期数:
2015年第05期
页码:
93-100
栏目:
工程地质
出版日期:
2015-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Dynamic Response of Soil Slope Reinforced by Anchors and Lattices Subjected to Dynamic Loads
文章编号:
1672-6561(2015)05-0093-08
作者:
郝建斌; 姚婕; 黄毓挺; 李金和
长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院，陕西 西安 710054
Author(s):
HAO Jian-bin;  YAO Jie;  HUANG Yu-ting;  LI Jin-he
School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
边坡稳定性; 地震; 正弦波; 动态响应; 振动台试验; 锚杆; 格构
Keywords:
slope stability;  earthquake;  sinusoidal wave;  dynamic response;  shaking table test;  anchor;  lattice
分类号:
TU476;P64
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
地震边坡稳定性是岩土工程和地震工程中研究的重点问题之一。针对锚杆格构支护的均质土坡在地震荷载作用下的动力响应，通过振动台模型试验，分析了不同坡高地震加速度和速度响应规律、边坡位移特征及支护结构破坏特征，揭示了均质土坡及其支护结构在地震作用下的变形破坏机理。结果表明：随着振动次数的增加，边坡模型自振频率逐渐降低；低频动荷载作用下坡体上部加速度响应最大，但随着振动频率的增加，放大作用降低，即边坡对低频振动波有放大作用，而对高频振动波却有滤波作用；振动频率较小时，坡体整体速度较大，但不同高度差异较小，破坏并不明显；振动频率接近模型边坡自振频率时，坡体上部速度最大，下部速度最小，且变化明显，破坏性最大；动荷载作用过程中，滑坡体的变形模式表现为旋转位移和水平位移，滑体和基体间相对位移上部较大；支护结构破坏时，上层锚杆和中层锚杆被拔出，上部格构发生严重隆起；虽然边坡做往复运动，但最终仍有一定相对位移；在设计支护结构时，要适当加长上部锚杆的长度，并且对中、上部格构进行补强。
Abstract:
Seismic slope stability is one of the key topics in geotechnical engineering and earthquake engineering. In order to study the dynamic response of homogeneous soil slope supported by anchors and lattices under seismic loading. Based on the shaking table test, the seismic acceleration, velocity and displacement of slope and the failure of supporting structures at different heights were analyzed, and the deformation and failure mechanisms of homogeneous soil slope and its supporting structures under seismic load were discussed. The results show that the nature frequency of slope model decreases with the increase of vibration time; the response of acceleration is maximum at the upper of slope subjected to dynamic load with low frequency, and the amplification effect decreases with the increase of vibrational frequency, that is, the slope has amplification effect on vibration waves at low frequency, and has filtering effect at high frequency; though the whole velocity of slope is large at low frequency, the velocities at different heights of slope are almost the same, so that there is no obvious failure happened to the slope and its supporting structures; when vibrational frequency is close to nature frequency of slope model, the velocity is maximum at the upper of slope and minimum at the bottom, and the failure is significant; the deformation types of landslide body subjected dynamic loads include rotation displacement and horizontal displacement, and the upper relative displacement between the active and the resistant parts of slope is large; when the supporting structures destroy, the top-row and mid-row anchors are pulled out, and the upper lattices bump seriously; though the slope shakes back and forth, there is relative displacement; the upper anchors are lengthened appropriately, and the middle and upper lattices are strengthened for the design of the supporting structures.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]熊炜,范文,邓龙胜,等.基于有限元修正节理岩质边坡稳定性计算的解析解[J].地球科学与环境学报,2011,33(03):306.
　XIONG Wei,FAN Wen,DENG Long-sheng,et al.Amendment of Analytical Solution on Stability of Joint Rock Slope Based on Finite Element Method[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2011,33(05):306.
[2]彭建兵,马润勇,范 文,等.汶川大震的科学思考[J].地球科学与环境学报,2009,31(01):1.
　PENG Jian-bing,MA Run-yong,FAN Wen,et al.Science Contemplation for Wenchuan Earthquake of 12 May, 2008[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2009,31(05):1.
[3]胡建平,赵军龙,汪文秉,等.三峡重庆库区深部地球 物理特征与断裂构造[J].地球科学与环境学报,2005,27(03):49.
　HU Jian-ping,ZHAO Jun-long,WANG Wen-bing,et al.Relation of deep geophysics fields and rupture construct in Yangtse Gorges Chongqing Reservoir area[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2005,27(05):49.
[4]陈红旗,彭建兵.区域地震稳定性的区域地震动力学评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(04):58.
　CHEN Hong-qi,PENG Jian-bing.Exercising regional seismic dynamics to estimate seismic stability[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2004,26(05):58.
[5]李德威.地震与地热的关联性：从预测减灾到取能减灾[J].地球科学与环境学报,2017,39(04):563.
　LI De-wei.Relevance of Seismicity and Geothermics: A New Thought to Alleviate Disasters from Earthquake Prediction to Taking Energy[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2017,39(05):563.
[6]邓亚虹,徐召,孙科,等.一种考虑波动效应的拟动力地震边坡稳定性分析方法[J].地球科学与环境学报,2019,41(05):623.
　DENG Ya-hong,XU Zhao,SUN Ke,et al.Pseudo-dynamic Seismic Slope Stability Analysis Method Considering Wave Propagation Effects[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2019,41(05):623.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-12-27
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41102177,41440021);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2013G2261010)
作者简介:郝建斌(1975-),女,山西武乡人,副教授,工学博士,博士后,E-mail:dcdgx28@chd.edu.cn?
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-28