|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]汤中立,钱壮志,姜常义,等.岩浆硫化物矿床勘查研究的趋势与小岩体成矿系统[J].地球科学与环境学报,2011,33(01):1-9.
 TANG Zhong-li,QIAN Zhuang-zhi,JIANG Chang-yi,et al.Trends of Research in Exploration of Magmatic Sulfide Deposits and Small Intrusions Metallogenic System[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2011,33(01):1-9.
点击复制

岩浆硫化物矿床勘查研究的趋势与小岩体成矿系统(PDF)
分享到:

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2011年第01期
页码:
1-9
栏目:
院士专稿
出版日期:
2011-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Trends of Research in Exploration of Magmatic Sulfide Deposits and Small Intrusions Metallogenic System
文章编号:
1672-6561(2011)01-0001-09
作者:
汤中立1钱壮志12姜常义1闫海卿1焦建刚1刘民武12徐章华1徐刚1王亚磊1
1.长安大学 地球科学与资源学院,陕西 西安 710054; 2. 长安大学 西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710054
Author(s):
TANG Zhong-li1QIAN Zhuang-zhi12JIANG Chang-yi1YAN Hai-qing1JIAO Jian-gang1LIU Min-wu12XU Zhang-hua1XU Gang1WANG Ya-lei1
1. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China; 2. Key Laboratory of West MineralResources and Geological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China
关键词:
岩浆硫化物矿床大型层状岩体铂族矿床小岩体成矿系统Ni-Cu(PGE)矿床
Keywords:
magmatic sulfide deposit large layered intrusion PGE deposit small intrusion metallogenic system Ni-Cu(PGE)deposit
分类号:
P611.1+1
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过2009年西安Ni-Cu(Pt)岩浆矿床国际学术研讨会和近10年来的勘查研究现状,可以看出岩浆硫化物矿床勘查领域的发展趋势为:与大型层状岩体有关的铂族矿床仍然受到关注;Sudbury矿床的特殊性和不可参照性取得了共识;小岩体矿床是勘查研究的主流;通道成矿作用受到重视。以大型层状岩体Bushveld为例,介绍了其中的Merensky矿层、UG-2矿层和北翼接触带的Platreef矿床。由于中国没有发现这种大型层状岩体,因此应当重视那些中小型层状岩体中可能赋存的铂族矿床。迄今为止,除了Sudbury矿床这个特殊的实例之外,国内外所有具有经济意义的Ni-Cu矿床都寄生于小岩体中并自成一个成矿系统。这个小岩体成矿系统包含成矿背景、邻近深大断裂、原始岩浆、先导性岩浆成岩作用、继发性岩浆成矿作用以及深部熔离-分期贯入-终端岩浆房聚集成矿等。近10年的勘查实践进一步说明,这类小岩体矿床仍是中国今后的主要勘查研究方向。最后,介绍了Noril'sk-Talnakh和Voisey'sBay矿床的深部熔离-通道成矿机制,这种机制增添了小岩体成矿作用的多样性;但是,其现存空间是开放性岩浆通道还是封闭性终端岩浆房,还有待更多的研究和实践。
Abstract:
The trends of research in exploration of magmatic sulfide deposits can be seen from the Xi'an International Ni-Cu(PGE)Deposit Symposium 2009 and the achievements of exploration research over the past decade as following: the PGE deposits related to the large-layered intrusions still receive much attention; it is agreed that the Sudbury deposit is unique and worthy of little reference; small intrusion metallogenic system becomes the main stream of the research; the theory of magma plumbing mineralization receives much attention. Bushveld, which is a large-layered intrusion, is taken as an example with brief introduction for the Merensky ore bed, UG-2 ore bed and Platreef ore deposit in the north wing of the contact zone. As there is no large rock mass discovered in China, the exploration of potential PGE deposits hosted in small- and medium-scale layered rock mass should be paid much attention. Except the particular instance of Sudbury deposit, most of the Ni-Cu deposits with economic values discovered all over the world were hosted in the small intrusions as individual metallogenitic system. The system includes metallogenic background, adjacent to deep fault, primary magma, and the digenesis of pilot magma, the mineralization of secondary magma and the segregation in deep-stage chamber, the pulsing penetration- mineralization in terminal magma chamber, etc. The exploration result over the past decade suggests that the type of small intrusion deposit is still the main target of research and exploration in China in the future. The metallogenic mechanism of deep liquation and conduit system of Noril'sk-Talnakh and Voisey's Bay deposits is introduced, and adds the diversity of small intrusions mineralization. However, it is to be answered by the future research and practice whether the ore-host space is an open conduit system or an closed terminal magma chamber.

参考文献/References:

[1] Li C S,Rimply E M.New Developments in Magmatic Ni-Cu and PGE Deposits[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2009.
[2] Tang Z L.Small Intrusion Making Large Ore:Significance for the Exploration of Jinchuan Ni-Cu Sulfide Deposit[C]∥Li W Y.Proceedings of Xi'an International Ni-Cu(Pt)Deposit Symposium 2009.Beijing:Science Press,2009:67-70.
[3] Buick I S,Maas R,Gibson R.Precise U-Pb Titanite Age Constraints on the Emplacement of the Bushveld Complex,South Africa[J].Journal of the Geological Society,2001,158(1):3-6.
[4] Hatton C J.Mantle Plume Origin for the Bushveld and Ventersdorp Magmatic Provinces[J].Journal of African Earth Sciences,1995,21(4):571-577.
[5] Hamilton P J,O'Nions R K,Evensen N M.Sm-Nd Dating of Archaean Basic and Ultrabasic Volcanics[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,1977,36(2):263-268.
[6] Pirajno F.Hotspots and Mantle Plumes:Global Intraplate Tectonics,Magmatism and Ore Deposits[J].Mineralogy and Petrology,2004,82(3/4):183-216.
[7] Premo W R,Helz R T,Zientek M L,et al.U-Pb and Sm-Nd Ages for the Stillwater Complex and Its Associated Sills and Dikes,Beartooth Mountains,Montana:Identification of a Parent Magma[J].Geology,1990,18(11):1065-1068.
[8] Naldrett A J.Magmatic Sulfide Deposits:Geology,Geochemi-stry and Exploration[M].New York:Springer,2004.
[9] Kamo S L,Czamanske G K,Krogh T E.A Minimum U-Pb Age for Siberian Flood-basalt Volcanism[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.1996,60(18):3505-3511.
[10] Bayanova T B,Voloshin A V.U-Pb Dating of Zircon Megacrysts(8 sm)from Amazonite Rand-pegmatite of Mt.Ploskaya,Baltic Shield[C]∥Committee of European Union of Geosciences Conference.EUG-10.Strasbourg:European Union of Geosciences Conference,1999:153.
[11] Amelin Y,Li C S,Naldrett A J.Geochronology of the Voisey's Bay Intrusion,Labrador,Canada,by Precise U-Pb Dating of Coexisting Baddeleyite,Zircon,and Apatite[J].Lithos,1999,47(1/2):33-51.
[12] 汤中立,杨杰东,徐士进,等.金川含矿超铁镁岩的Sm-Nd定年[J].科学通报,1992,37(10):918-920.
[13] Zhang M J,Kamo S L,Li C S,et al.Precise U-Pb Zircon-baddeleyite Age of the Jinchuan Sulfideore-bearing Ultramafic Intrusion,Western China[J].Mineralium Deposita,2010,45(1):3-9.
[14] 郗爱华,顾连兴,李绪俊,等.吉林红旗岭铜镍硫化物矿床的成矿时代讨论[J].矿床地质,2005,24(5):521-526.
[15] Wu F Y,Wilde S A,Zhang G L,et al.Geochronology and Petrogenesis of the Post-orogenic Cu-Ni Sulfide-bearing Mafic-ultramafic Complexes in Jilin Province,NE China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2004,23(5):781-797.
[16] 陶 琰,马言胜,苗来成,等.云南金宝山超镁铁岩体锆石SHRIMP年龄[J].科学通报,2008,53(22):2828-2832.
[17] 石贵勇,孙晓明,王生伟,等.云南白马寨铜镍硫化物矿床Re-Os同位素定年及其地质意义[J].岩石学报,2006,22(10):2451-2256.
[18] 张作衡,柴凤梅,杜安道,等.新疆喀拉通克铜镍硫化物矿床Re-Os同位素测年及成矿物质来源示踪[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2005,24(4):285-293.
[19] 韩宝福,季建清,宋 彪,等.新疆喀拉通克和黄山东含铜镍矿镁铁-超镁铁杂岩体的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].科学通报,2004,49(22):2324-2328.
[20] Zhou M F,Lesher C M,Yang Z X,et al.Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of 270 Ma Ni-Cu-(PGE)Sulfide-bearing Mafic Intrusions in the Huangshan District,Eastern Xinjiang,Northwest China:Implications for the Tectonic Evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J].Chemical Geology,2004,209(3/4):233-257.
[21] 李华芹,谢才富,常海亮,等.新疆北部有色贵金属矿床成矿作用年代学[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.
[22] 三金柱,秦克章,汤中立,等.东天山图拉尔根大型铜镍矿区两个镁铁-超镁铁岩体的锆石U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J].岩石学报,2010,26(10):3027-3035.
[23] Cameron E N.Evolution of the Lower Critical Zone,Central Sector,Eastern Bushveld Complex,and Its Chromite Deposits[J].Economic Geology,1980,75(6):845-871.
[24] Cameron E N.The Upper Citical Zone of the Eastern Bushveld Complex; Precursor to the Merensky Reef[J].Economic Geology,1982,77(6):1307-1327.
[25] Gruenewaldt G V.The Main and Upper Zones of the Bushveld Complex in the Roossenekal Area,Eastern Transvaal[J].Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa,1973,76:207-227.
[26] Molyneaux T G.A Geological Investigation of the Bushveld Complex in Sekhukhunelan and Apart of the Stelpoort Valley[J].Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa,1974,77:329-338.
[27] Naldrett A J,Cameron G M,VonGruenewaldt G,et al.The Formation of Stratiform PGE Deposits in Layered Intrusions[M].Dordrecht:NATO Advanced Research Workshop,1987.
[28] Dietz R S.Sudbury Structure as an Astrobleme[J].The Journal of Geology,1964,72(4):412-434.
[29] Walker R J,Morgan J W,Naldrett A J,et al.Re-Os Isotopic Systematics of Ni-Cu Sulfide Ores,Sudbury Igneous Complex,Ontario:Evidence for a Major Crustal Component[J].Earth Planetary Science Letters,1991,105(4):416-429.
[30] Grieve R A.An Impact Model of the Sudbury Structure[C]∥Lightfoot P C,Naldrett A J.Proceedings of the Sudbury-Noril'sk Symposium.Noril'sk:Ontario Geological Survey,1994:119-132.
[31] Maier W D,Li C S,Waal S A.Why Are There No Major Ni-Cu Sulfide Deposits in Large Layered Mafic-ulmafic Intusion[J].The Canadian Mineralogist,2001,39(2):547-556.
[32] Li C S,Xu Z H,Waal S A,et al.Compositional Variations of Olivine from the Jinchuan Ni-Cu Sulfide Deposit,Western China:Implication for Ore Genesis[J].Mineralium Deposita,2004,39(2):159-172.
[33] 宋谢炎,肖家飞,朱 丹,等.岩浆通道系统与岩浆硫化物成矿研究新进展[J].地学前缘,2010,17(1):153-163.
[34] Arndt N T,Lesher C M,Czamanske G K.Mantle-derived Magmas and Magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE)Deposits[C]∥Hedenquist J W,Thompson J F H,Goldfarb R J,et al.Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume.Littleton:Society of Economic Geologists,2005:5-23.
[35] Naldrett A J,Lightfoot P C,Fedorenko V,et al.Geology and Geochemistry of Intrusions and Flood Basalts of the Noril'sk Region,USSR,with Implication for the Origin of the Ni-Cu-PGE Ores[J].Economic Geology,1992,87(4):975-1004.
[36] Song X Y,Zhou M F,Cao Z M,et al.Ni-Cu-(PGE)Magmatic Sulfide Deposits in the Yangliuping Area,Permian Emeishan Igneous Province,SW China[J].Mineralium Deposita,2003,38(7):831-843.
[37] Song X Y,Zhou M F,Keays R R,et al.Geochemistry of the Emeishan Flood Basalts at Yangliuping,Sichuan,SW China:Implications for Sulfide Segregation[J].Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology,2006,152(1):53-74.
[38] 三金柱,田 斌,雷军文,等.新疆东天山新发现图拉尔根全岩矿化岩浆铜镍矿床[J].矿床地质,2003,22(3):270.
[39] 三金柱,惠卫东,秦克章,等.新疆哈密图拉尔根全岩矿化岩浆铜-镍-钴矿床地质特征及找矿方向[J].矿床地质,2007,26(3):307-316.
[40] 孙 赫,秦克章,李金祥,等.东天山图拉尔根铜镍钴硫化物矿床岩相、岩石地球化学特征及其形成的构造背景[J].中国地质,2006,33(3):606-617.
[41] 刘 壮,汤中立.新疆哈密图拉尔根Ni-Cu硫化物矿床成矿模式研究[J].甘肃地质,2010,19(3):1-8.
[42] Naldrett A J,Fedorenko V A,Lightfoot P C,et al.Ni-Cu-PGE Deposits of Noril'sk Region,Siberia:Their Formation in Conduits for Flood Basalt Volcanism[J].Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy Section B:Applied Earth Science,1995,104:B18-B36.
[43] Naldrett A J.World-class Ni-Cu-PGE Deposits:Key Factors in Their Genesis[J].Mineralium Deposita,1999,34(3):227-240.
[44] Li C S,Ripley E M,Naldrett A J.A New Gentic Model for the Giant Ni-Cu-PGE Sulfide Deposits Associated with the Sibe-rian Flood Basalts[J].Economic Geology,2009,104(2):291-301.

相似文献/References:

[1]焦建刚,汤中立,钱壮志,等.中国镍铜铂族岩浆矿床矿产地 空间数据库建设及其开发应用[J].地球科学与环境学报,2007,29(01):22.
 JIAO Jian-g ang,TANG Zhong-li,QIAN Zhuang-zhi,et al.Realization and Application of Spatial Database for Chinese Nickel-Copper (PGE) Sulfide Deposits Mineral Geology[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2007,29(01):22.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2010-12-25
基金项目: 国土资源部深部探测技术与实验研究专项项目(Sinoprobe-05-01); 国土资源部公益性行业科研专项项目(200911007-5; 201011058); 中国地质调查局项目(1212010630508)
作者简介: 汤中立(1934-),男,安徽安庆人,教授,博士研究生导师,中国工程院院士,从事岩浆矿床、区域成矿、地质矿产调查及矿山环境研究。E-mail:zltang@sohu.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2011-03-20