|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王欢,王琪,张功成,等.琼东南盆地梅山组泥岩盖层封闭性综合评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2011,33(02):152-158.
　WANG Huan,WANG Qi,ZHANG Gong-cheng,et al.Comprehensive Evaluation on the Sealing Ability of Mudstone Caprock in Meishan Formation of Qiongdongnan Basin[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2011,33(02):152-158.
点击复制

琼东南盆地梅山组泥岩盖层封闭性综合评价(PDF)
分享到：

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2011年第02期
页码:
152-158
栏目:
基础地质与矿产地质
出版日期:
2011-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comprehensive Evaluation on the Sealing Ability of Mudstone Caprock in Meishan Formation of Qiongdongnan Basin
文章编号:
1672-6561(2011)02-0152-07
作者:
王欢1; 2; 王琪1; 2; 张功成3; 张瑞1; 2; 郝乐伟1; 2; 马晓峰1; 2
1.中国科学院 油气资源研究重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000; 2.中国科学院 研究生院,北京 100049; 3.中国海洋石油研究总院,北京 100027
Author(s):
WANG Huan1; 2; WANG Qi1; 2; ZHANG Gong-cheng3; ZHANG Rui1; 2; HAO Le-wei1; 2; MA Xiao-feng1; 2
1. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000,Gansu, China; 2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Research Institute of China National Offshore Oil Corporation, Bei
关键词:
琼东南盆地; 梅山组; 盖层; 封闭能力; 排替压力; 综合评价
Keywords:
Qiongdongnan Basin;  Meishan Formation;  caprock;  sealing ability;  displacement pressure;  comprehensive evaluation
分类号:
P587
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过单井资料统计和沉积相研究,对琼东南盆地梅山组泥岩盖层进行宏观评价,认为盖层岩性以浅海—半深海相泥岩为主,主要发育于北部隆起带与中央坳陷带,侧向连续性好。其最大单层厚度、累积厚度以及含砂量等宏观参数显示,优质泥岩呈现沿北西—南东方向展布的特征。利用测井声波时差和实测岩石样本排替压力之间的关系,计算三亚组一段砂岩和梅山组泥岩的排替压力差,并进行微观评价,认为单井上排替压力差呈凸起高、凹陷低的特点。选取岩性、沉积环境、最大单层厚度、累积厚度、含砂量以及储层与盖层排替压力差作为参数,分别赋予相应的权值和权重,对泥岩盖层封闭性进行综合评价,认为梅山组泥岩盖层综合品质呈规律性变化,表现为北部坳陷低、中部隆起和中央坳陷高的特点,对三亚组发育于北部隆起带周缘的滨海相砂体和发育于中央坳陷带附近的浊积砂体起到了良好的封盖作用。
Abstract:
Based on the single well and sedimentary facies data, the mudstone caprock in Meishan Formation of Qiongdongnan Basin was comprehensively evaluated. The results showed that the lithology of caprock was mainly shallow-bathyal marine mudstone, and the caprock developed in northern uplift belt and central depression, and the lateral continuity was good. The macro parameters, which included the maximum single-layer thickness, cumulative thickness and sandy content, showed that high-quality mudstone distributed along the northwest-southeast direction. Based on the relationship between sonic interval transit time and the displacement pressure of observed rock sample, the difference of displacement pressure between sandstone in the first member of Sanya Formation and mudstone in Meishan Formation was calculated, and the microscopic evaluation was carried out. The results indicated that the characteristic of the difference of displacement pressure was high in the upland and low in the depression for single well. The parameters, which included lithology, sedimentary environment, the maximum single-layer thickness, cumulative thickness, sandy content and the difference of displacement pressure between reservoir and caprock, were evaluated with weight to comprehensively evaluate the sealing ability of mudstone caprock. The results revealed that the comprehensive quality of caprock in Meishan Formation changed regularly; the characteristics were low in the north depression and high in the central uplift belt and central depression; the sealing ability of mudstone caprock for the littoral facies sandbody developed around the northern uplift belt and turbidite sandbody developed around central depression was strong in Sanya Formation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张树林,田世澄.盖层的研究方法及其在油气勘探中的意义[J].地质科技情报,1993,12(1):73-78.
[2] 张长江,潘文蕾,刘光祥,等.中国南方志留系泥质岩盖层动态评价研究[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(3):301-310.
[3] 何光玉,张卫华.泥岩盖层研究现状及发展趋势[J].天然气地球科学,1997,8(2):9-12.
[4] 陈章明,姜振学,郭水生,等.泥质岩盖层封闭性综合评价及其在琼东南盆地的应用[J].中国海上油气(地质),1995,9(1):1-6.
[5] 付 广,陈章明,姜振学.盖层物性封闭能力的研究方法[J].中国海上油气(地质),1995,9(2):83-88.
[6] 龚再升.中国近海大油气田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
[7] 张功成,米立军,吴时国,等.深水区——南海北部大陆边缘盆地油气勘探新领域[J].石油学报,2007,28(2):15-21.
[8] 袁玉松,杨树春,胡圣标,等.琼东南盆地构造沉降史及其主控因素[J].地球物理学报,2008,51(2):376-383.
[9] 周小鹰,魏魁生.QDN盆地层序地层及生储盖组合分析[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(3):244-248.
[10] 魏魁生,崔旱云,叶淑芬,等.琼东南盆地高精度层序地层学研究[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2001,26(1):59-66.
[11] 郝诒纯,陈平富,万晓樵,等.南海北部莺歌海—琼东南盆地晚第三纪层序地层与海平面变化[J].现代地质,2000,14(3):237-245.
[12] 王振峰,何家雄.琼东南盆地中新统油气运聚成藏条件及成藏组合分析[J].天然气地球科学,2003,13(2):107-115.
[13] 马玉波,吴时国,许建龙,等.琼东南盆地南部深水凹陷生物礁及碳酸盐岩台地发育模式[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(1):119-124.
[14] 黄志龙,郝石生,盖层突破压力及排替压力的求取方法[J].新疆石油地质,1994,15(2):163-166.
[15] Hao S S,Huang Z L,Liu G D,et al.Geophysical Properties of Cap Rocks in Qiongdongnan Basin,South China Sea[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2000,17(4):547-555.
[16] 郑德文.天然气毛细封闭盖层评价标准的建立[J].天然气地球科学,1994,5(3):29-33.
[17] 李纯泉,陈红汉,张树林.琼东南盆地压力场及其演化特征[J].新疆石油地质,2002,23(5):389-391.
[18] 付 广,许凤鸣.盖层厚度对封闭能力控制作用分析[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(3):186-190.
[19] 付 广,陈章明,吕延防,等.泥质岩盖层封盖性能综合评价方法探讨 [J].石油实验地质,1998,20(1):80-86.
[20] 宋子齐,李亚玲,潘玲黎,等.测井资料在小洼油田盖层评价中的应用[J].油气地质与采收率,2005,12(4):4-6.
[21] 康德江,付 广,吕延防.贝尔断陷布达特群泥岩盖层综合评价[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(5):44-46.

相似文献/References:

[1]张伟,何家雄,李晓唐,等.南海北部大陆边缘琼东南盆地含油气系统[J].地球科学与环境学报,2015,37(05):80.
　ZHANG Wei,HE Jia-xiong,LI Xiao-tang,et al.Petroleum System in Qiongdongnan Basin of the Continental Margin, the Northern South China Sea[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2015,37(02):80.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2010-07-20
基金项目: 国家科技重大专项基金项目(2008ZX05025; 2008ZX05025-006; 2008ZX05025-006-01)
作者简介: 王 欢(1985-),男,北京人,理学硕士研究生,从事矿物岩石学研究。E-mail: wanghuan19851228@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2011-06-20