«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

卷:

第35卷

期数:

2013年第02期

页码:

92-98

栏目:

水资源与环境

出版日期:

2013-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:

Geological Environmental Influence of Lushan Ms7.0 Earthquake in Sichuan

文章编号:

1672-6561(2013)02-0092-07

作者:

王运生; 全清; 罗永红; 张磊; 申通

成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059

Author(s):

WANG Yun-sheng;  QUAN Qing;  LUO Yong-hong;  ZHANG Lei;  SHEN Tong

State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, Sichuan, China

关键词:

芦山地震; 地质灾害; 地质环境影响; 崩塌; 斜坡裂缝; 沙土液化; 路基沉陷

Keywords:

Lushan earthquake;  geohazard;  geological environmental influence;  avalanche;  slope crack;  liquefaction of sand;  subsidence of roadbed

分类号:

P694

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

2013年4月20日四川省雅安市芦山县发生Ms7.0级地震,此次地震对地质环境的影响备受各界关注。基于遥感解译与震后现场调查,对芦山地震的地质环境影响进行了初步分析。结果发现芦山地震的地质环境影响主要有:诱发较为广泛的崩塌等次生山地灾害,崩塌以小型为主,主要分布在双石—大川断裂带槽谷以及北西向几个深切峡谷段,如S210省道芦山—宝兴峡谷、芦山—双石峡谷、龙门—太平峡谷,其中震中区宝盛、太平镇崩塌密度最大;泥石流动静物源有不同程度增加,崩塌新增了泥石流沟的物源;斜坡上缓坡带也堆积有新的崩塌物源,使震后沟谷泥石流与坡面泥石流发生的概率增加;斜坡震裂现象较普遍,震动引起斜坡表层覆盖层不均匀沉降,宏观上表现为地面开裂、房屋开裂以及公路路基失效等；沙土液化加重灾害程度，震动引起发震断裂槽谷区砂土液化，使发震断裂带上地基失效，震害加重；厚覆盖层场地效应使地震下盘平坝区震害异常，下盘前陆盆地厚覆盖层地区地震波放大效应使芦山县龙门、清仁以及天全县老场、仁义平坝区及斜坡地带震害严重；芦山地震地质环境影响最大的区域是震中区太平—宝盛一带，其次是断裂带下盘5 km—上盘5 km 的地带、宝兴县城区域及前陆盆地带。

Abstract:

A Ms7.0 earthquake hitted Lushan county of Ya’an city, Sichuan province on April 20, 2013, and the geological environmental influence of the earthquake was concerned. Based on remote sensing interpretation and field survey, the geological environmental influence of Lushan earthquake was analyzed preliminarily. The main geological environmental influences included that Lushan earthquake induced wide spread secondary avalanche mountainous disasters with small scale, which distributed along the trough valley of Shuangshi-Dachuan fracture zone and the NW gorges cutting structural belts, such as S210 provincial road Lushan-Baoxing gorge, Lushan-Shuangshi gorge and Longmen-Taiping gorge, and the distribution density of avalanche in Baosheng and Taiping towns near the epicenter was largest; the active and stable sources of debris flow were increased by avalanche because of the earthquake; the new sources of avalanche increased in the gullies and gentle slopes, and the probability of gully-shaped and slope debris flows after the earthquake increased; seismic cracking was common in the slopes, and the uneven settlement of slope surface blanket caused by vibration resulted in ground fracturing, building cracking, roadbed failure, etc.; sand liquefaction increased the damage, and the sand liquefaction in trough valley of causative fault caused by vibration resulted in foundation failure above the causative fault; the site effect of thick overburden layer caused the abnormal damage in the river plain which located in the footwall of earthquake, and the amplification effect of earthquake wave in thick overburden layer of footwall foreland basin caused serious collapse and crack, such as the river plain in Longmen and Qingren of Lushan county, Laochang and Renyi of Tianquan county and slope zone; the most serious area of geological environmental influence of Lushan earthquake was Taiping-Baosheng near the epicenter, the more serious area was fault zone footwall 5 km to hanging wall 5 km, urban area of Baoxing county and foreland basin.

参考文献/References:

[1] 许冲,徐锡伟,吴熙彦,等.2008年汶川地震滑坡详细编目及其空间分布规律分析[J].工程地质学报,2013,21(1):25-44.
[2] 施斌,王宝军,张巍,等.汶川地震次生地质灾害分析与灾后调查[J].高校地质学报,2008,14(3):387-394.
[3] 王运生,罗永红,吉峰,等.汶川大地震山地灾害发育的控制因素分析[J].工程地质学报,2008,16(6):759-763.
[4] 陈宁,王运生,蒋发森,等.汶川县渔子溪地震地质灾害特征及灾害链成生分析[J].工程地质学报,2012,20(3):340-349.
[5] 王绪本,余年,朱迎堂,等.龙门山逆冲构造带大地电磁测深初步成果[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2008,35(4):398-403.
[6] WANG Y S,HUANG R Q,LUO Y H,et al.The Genetic Mechanism of Wenchuan Earthquake[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2011,8(2):336-344.
[7] 林茂炳,陈运则.龙门山南段双石断裂的特征及地质意义[J].成都理工学院学报,1996,23(2):64-68.
[8] 陶晓风.龙门山南段推覆构造与前陆盆地演化[J].成都理工学院学报,1999,26(1):73-77.
[9] 秦向辉,陈群策,谭成轩,等.龙门山断裂带西南段现今地应力状态与地震危险性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(增1):2870-2876.
[10] 贾营营,付碧宏,王岩,等.青藏高原东缘龙门山断裂带晚新生代构造地貌生长及水系响应[J].第四纪研究,2010,30(4):825-836.
[11] 崔书红.汶川地震生态环境影响及对策[J].环境保护,2008(13):37-38.
[12] 徐新良,江东,庄大方,等.汶川地震灾害核心区生态环境影响评估[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):5899-5908.
[13] 彭建兵,马润勇,范文,等.汶川大震的科学思考[J].地球科学与环境学报,2009,31(1):1-29.
[14] 四川省测绘地理信息局.“4·20”芦山7.0级地震地理信息发布平台[DB/OL].(2013-04-21)[2013-05-02]. http://www.scgis.net/LSXEarthquake.
[15] WANG Y S,LUO Y H,WANG F H,et al.Slope Seismic Response Monitoring on the Aftershocks of the Wenchuan Earthquake in the Mianzhu Section[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2012,9(4):523-528.
[16] 唐益群,杨奇,周洁.汶川地震对村镇建筑地基破坏模式分析[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(1):39-47,127.

相似文献/References:

[1]谢和平,邓建辉,李碧雄.四川芦山地震灾害调查与灾后重建的相关问题分析[J].地球科学与环境学报,2013,35(02):1.
　XIE He-ping,DENG Jian-hui,LI Bi-xiong.Investigation of Lushan Earthquake Disasters and Analysis of Related Problems During Post-quake Reconstruction in Sichuan[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2013,35(02):1.
[2]张红艳,谢富仁,崔效锋.四川芦山地震区域构造环境与构造应力场特征[J].地球科学与环境学报,2013,35(02):99.
　ZHANG Hong-yan,XIE Fu-ren,CUI Xiao-feng.Regional Characteristics of Tectonic Stress Field and Tectonic Setting of Lushan Earthquake in Sichuan[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2013,35(02):99.
[3]王伟锋,卿艳彬,朱传华,等.横断层作用下汶川地震与芦山地震发震机制新探[J].地球科学与环境学报,2014,36(03):102.
　WANG Wei-feng,QING Yan-bin,ZHU Chuan-hua,et al.New Viewpoints of the Seismogenic Mechanism of Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes Under the Action of Transverse Fault[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2014,36(02):102.
[4]熊林,何建坤,潘正洋,等.汶川地震和芦山地震对青藏高原东缘主要活动断层应力变化的影响[J].地球科学与环境学报,2014,36(03):113.
　XIONG Lin,HE Jian-kun,PAN Zheng-yang,et al.Effects of Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes on the Changes of Stress of Main Active Tectonics in the Eastern Edge of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2014,36(02):113.
[5]宋彦辉,李忠生,高虎艳,等.西安三类勘察场地隐伏地裂缝识别特征[J].地球科学与环境学报,2015,37(04):94.
　SONG Yan-hui,LI Zhong-sheng,GAO Hu-yan,et al.Recognition Features of Non-outcropping Ground Fissures for the Third Investigation Site in Xi’an[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2015,37(02):94.
[6]彭建兵,马润勇,范 文,等.汶川大震的科学思考[J].地球科学与环境学报,2009,31(01):1.
　PENG Jian-bing,MA Run-yong,FAN Wen,et al.Science Contemplation for Wenchuan Earthquake of 12 May, 2008[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2009,31(02):1.
[7]邓亚虹,彭建兵,卢全中,等.地铁工程地质灾害危险性综合评估定量方法——以西安地铁一号线为例[J].地球科学与环境学报,2009,31(03):291.
　DENG Ya-hong,PENG Jian-bing,LU Quan-zhong,et al.Quantification Grading Method in Subway Engineering Risk Assessment of Geological Disasters——Taking No.1 Subway in Xi'an as an Example[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2009,31(02):291.
[8]马润勇,彭建兵,袁志东,等.青藏高原隆升的黄土高原构造侵蚀效应[J].地球科学与环境学报,2007,29(03):289.
　MA Run-yong,PENG Jian-bing,YUAN Zhi-dong,et al.Geological Hazard Effect in Loess Plateau due to Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Uplift[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2007,29(02):289.
[9]胡建刚,刘勇平,姜海波.怒江左岸小型水电工程地质环境适宜性评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2007,29(03):294.
　HU Jian-gang,LIU Yong-ping,JIANG Hai-bo.Geological Environment Feasibility for Constructing Small-Scale Hydropower Engineering on Nujiang River Left Bank[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2007,29(02):294.
[10]田梅青,姜振泉,刘炜金,等.山东省栖霞市泥石流灾害的 成生环境及危险性趋势分区评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2005,27(04):24.
　TIAN Mei-qing,JIANG Zhen-quan,LIU Wei-jin,et al.Zonal Evaluation on Formation Environment and Dangerous Trend of Debris Flow in Qixia City of Shandong Province[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2005,27(02):24.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2013-05-10
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41072231);中国地质调查局地质大调查项目(12120113009700)
作者简介:王运生(1960-),男,安徽潜山人,教授,博士研究生导师,工学博士,E-mail:wangys60@163.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2013-06-20