|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]介玉新,柏永亮,张彬.基于加速度的边坡和挡土墙稳定性分析[J].地球科学与环境学报,2015,37(06):120-126.
　JIE Yu-xin,BAI Yong-liang,ZHANG Bin.Stability Analysis of Slopes and Retaining Walls Based on Acceleration[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2015,37(06):120-126.
点击复制

基于加速度的边坡和挡土墙稳定性分析(PDF)
分享到：

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

卷:
第37卷
期数:
2015年第06期
页码:
120-126
栏目:
工程地质
出版日期:
2015-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Stability Analysis of Slopes and Retaining Walls Based on Acceleration
文章编号:
1672-6561(2015)06-0120-07
作者:
介玉新; 柏永亮; 张彬
1. 清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室，北京 100084；2. 中国地质大学(北京) 工程技术学院，北京 100083
Author(s):
JIE Yu-xin;  BAI Yong-liang;  ZHANG Bin
1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
关键词:
边坡; 挡土墙; 加速度; 角加速度; 惯性力; 安全系数; 土压力; 条分法
Keywords:
slope;  retaining wall;  acceleration;  angular acceleration;  inertial force;  safety factor;  soil pressure;  slice method
分类号:
TU43；P642.11+6
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
评价边坡稳定性可以用最小安全系数，也可以用基于加速度的指标，比如最大加速度、最大惯性力、最大角加速度等。它们可以从另外的角度来看待边坡的稳定和失稳行为。这种思路也可以推广到挡土墙土压力计算。算例计算表明：基于瑞典条分法和简化毕肖甫法的假定对加速度、惯性力和角加速度的计算结果相同，说明它们的计算对条间力的假定不敏感；相对于滑体质心的角加速度不能单独用来判断滑体的稳定情况；对挡土墙土压力来说，由于外部支撑力的引入改变了土条的受力条件，最大惯性力的大小和方向与土压力并没有一致性的关系；随着土的强度参数的不同，最大惯性力可能大于挡土墙土压力，也可能小于土压力；以此类比，根据事先引入支挡结构力的作用方向得到的不平衡推力会更合理。
Abstract:
Like the minimum safety factor, the indices based on acceleration, such as the maximum acceleration, maximum inertial force and maximum angular acceleration, can also be employed to evaluate the stability of slopes. In fact, they provide the probability to review the stability and instability of slopes from another point of view. This approach can also be extended to studying the soil pressure of retaining walls. Numerical results show that it is the same for the acceleration, inertial force and angular acceleration calculated based on the assumptions of Sweden slice method and simplified Bishop method, respectively, which imply that they are not sensitive to the assumption of forces between slices; the angular acceleration relative to the barycenter of the slip mass can not be independently used to evaluate the stability of slopes; for the soil pressure of retaining wall, due to the external bracing force changes the stress state of slices, the maximum inertial force is not consistent with the soil pressure either in magnitude or in direction; with the different strength parameters of soils, the maximum inertial force may be greater, or less than the soil pressure of retaining wall; analogously, it will be more reasonable to compute the imbalance thrust force of retaining structures by introducing its direction in advance.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]田述军,孔纪名,陈泽富.基于公路功能的边坡灾害易损性评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2013,35(03):119.
　TIAN Shu-jun,KONG Ji-ming,CHEN Ze-fu.Vulnerability Assessment of Slope Hazard Based on Function of Highway[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2013,35(06):119.
[2]李萍,张波,李同录.黄土高原边坡特征与破坏规律的分区研究[J].地球科学与环境学报,2012,34(03):89.
　LI Ping,ZHANG Bo,LI Tong-lu.Study on Regionalization for Characteristic and Destruction Rule of Slope in Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2012,34(06):89.
[3]邓通发,桂勇,罗嗣海,等.降雨条件下花岗岩残坡积土路堑边坡稳定性研究[J].地球科学与环境学报,2012,34(04):88.
　DENG Tong-fa,GUI Yong,LUO Si-hai,et al.Study on Slope Stability of Granite Residual Soil Cutting Excavation with Rainfall[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2012,34(06):88.
[4]李同录,王刘华,张常亮,等.土质边坡空间临界滑动面搜索的优化算法[J].地球科学与环境学报,2011,33(03):300.
　LI Tong-lu,WANG Liu-hua,ZHANG Chang-liang,et al.Optimistic Method for Searching the Spatial Critical Slip Surface of Earth Slopes[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2011,33(06):300.
[5]刘悦,黄强兵.模拟堆载作用的黄土边坡土体变形机理试验[J].地球科学与环境学报,2007,29(02):183.
　LIU Yue,HUANG Qiang-bing.Test Study for Simulating Soil Deformation Mechanism of Loess Slope Under Load Condition[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2007,29(06):183.
[6]陈文玲,赵法锁.基于模糊一致矩阵理论的边坡稳定性评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2007,29(04):408.
　CHEN Wen-ling,ZHAO Fa-suo.Stability Evaluation of Slope in Geological Hazard Survey Based on Fuzzy Consistent Matrix Theory[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2007,29(06):408.
[7]张梦涵,魏 进*,卞海丁.基于机器学习的边坡稳定性分析方法——以国内618个边坡为例[J].地球科学与环境学报,2022,44(06):1083.[doi:10.19814/j.jese.2022.09019]
　ZHANG Meng-han,WEI Jin*,BIAN Hai-ding.Slope Stability Analysis Method Based on Machine Learning—Taking 618 Slopes in China as Examples[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2022,44(06):1083.[doi:10.19814/j.jese.2022.09019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2015-05-01
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51279085);国家重点基础研究发展计划（“九七三”计划）项目(2013CB036402);水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室项目(2013-KY-4)
作者简介:介玉新(1970-),男,河南新安人,教授,博士研究生导师,工学博士,E-mail:jieyx@tsinghua.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-11-27