«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《地球科学与环境学报》[ISSN:1672-6561/CN:61-1423/P]

卷:

第41卷

期数:

2019年第05期

页码:

613-622

栏目:

应用地球物理

出版日期:

2019-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:

Response Characteristics of Slope Seismic to Gongxian M_s 5.4 Earthquake in Sichuan, China

文章编号:

1672-6561(2019)05-0613-10

作者:

王运生; 刘江伟; 赵波; 罗永红; 明伟庭;  罗越; 金刚; 周宇航

(成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059)

Author(s):

WANG Yun-sheng;  LIU Jiang-wei;  ZHAO Bo;  LUO Yong-hong;  MING Wei-ting;  LUO Yue;  JIN Gang;  ZHOU Yu-hang

(State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, Sichuan, China)

关键词:

珙县M_s 5.4级地震;  长宁M_s 6.0级地震;  斜坡;  坡体稳定性;  放大效应;  反应谱;  四川

Keywords:

Gongxian M_s 5.4 earthquake;  Changning M_s 6.0 earthquake;  slope;  slope stability;  site amplification;  response spectrum;  Sichuan

分类号:

P642.27

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

四川珙县M_s 5.4级地震是长宁M_s 6.0级地震第三大余震,在震中区诱发了多处滑坡和崩塌,研究坡体不同部位地震动响应特征对地震地质灾害预测和防治意义重大。通过在距离震源近的斜坡不同位置布置监测点,获取地震动参数及相关变化规律,对研究区域的坡体进行稳定性分析和研究。结果表明:地震在南北向的放大效应大于东西向,覆盖层土体最大位移达到了7.42 mm,与地震时南北向晃动强烈吻合; 对比分析各个监测点的峰值加速度(PGA)、阿里亚斯(Arias)强度,覆盖层土体比高位基岩的放大效应显著; 基岩地震波以低频为主,卓越频率为2～5 Hz,随着高程的增加对高频的地震波有过滤作用,在山顶3^#监测点的阿里亚斯强度比山脚1^#监测点(参考点)放大数倍,地震动能量强; 通过该区域的抗震设计反应谱与监测反应谱对比分析,可以得出覆盖层土体和高位基岩地震动强烈,前者的宏观表现为覆盖层土体上老旧房屋毁坏严重,后者为高位基岩坡体滑坡和崩塌。

Abstract:

Gongxian M_s 5.4 earthquake is the third largest aftershock after Changning M_s 6.0 earthquake, and numerous landslides and rockfalls are triggered in the earthquake area. In order to detect the influence of seismic response on slope stability, the monitoring points at different positions of the slope close to the source were arranged to obtain the seismic motion parameters and related variation rules. The results show that seismic site amplification in SN-direction is obvious larger than that in EW-direction, whose displacement is also largest, especially for the soil monitoring point(7.42 mm), it is consistent with the strong SN-direction shaking during the earthquake; the soil could produce more obvious site amplification than bedrock by comparing PGA and Arias intensity of all monitoring points, and it could produce stronger dynamic condition; the resonance frequency of bedrock mainly concentrates on 2-5 Hz, and the resonance frequency decreases with the increase of altitude, the Arias intensity of mountain top(3^# monitoring point)is obviously stronger than that of mountain foot(1^# monitoring point); according to the comparison of seismic design response spectrums and monitoring response spectrums, the soil and bedrock could occur geohazards easily, which threaten to building stability.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王运生,徐鸿彪,罗永红,等.地震高位滑坡形成条件及抛射运动程式研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(11):2360-2368. WANG Yun-sheng,XU Hong-biao,LUO Yong-hong,et al.Study of Formation Conditions and Toss Motion Program of High Landslides Induced by Earthquake[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2009,28(11):2360-2368.
[2] 罗永红,王运生.汶川地震诱发山地斜坡震动的地形放大效应[J].山地学报,2013,31(2):200-210. LUO Yong-hong,WANG Yun-sheng.Mountain Slope Ground Motion Topography Amplification Effect Induced by Wenchuan Earthquake[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2013,31(2):200-210.
[3] 黄润秋,李为乐.“5·12”汶川大地震触发地质灾害的发育分布规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(12):2585-2592. HUANG Run-qiu,LI Wei-le.Research on Development and Distribution Rules of Geohazards Induced by Wenchuan Earthquake on 12th May,2008[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2008,27(12):2585-2592.
[4] 黄润秋,李为乐.汶川大地震触发地质灾害的断层效应分析[J].工程地质学报,2009,17(1):19-28. HUANG Run-qiu,LI Wei-le.Fault Effects Analysis of Geo-hazard Triggered by Wenchuan Earthquake[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2009,17(1):19-28.
[5] 王运生,贺建先,罗永红,等.康定M_s 5.8级地震冷竹关坡体内地震动响应特征[J].西南交通大学学报,2015,50(5):838-844. WANG Yun-sheng,HE Jian-xian,LUO Yong-hong,et al.Seismic Responses of Lengzhuguan Slope During Kangding M_s 5.8 Earthquake[J].Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University,2015,50(5):838-844.
[6] 罗永红,王运生,何 源,等.“4·20”芦山地震冷竹关地震动响应监测数据分析[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(3):232-241. LUO Yong-hong,WANG Yun-sheng,HE Yuan,et al.Monitoring Result Analysis of Lenzhuguan Slope Ground Shock Response of Lushan Earthquake of Sichuan,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science and Technology Edition),2013,40(3):232-241.
[7] TRIPE R,KONTOE S,WONG T K C.Slope Topo-graphy Effects on Ground Motion in the Presence of Deep Soil Layers[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2013,50:72-84.
[8] 苏生瑞,张永双,李 松,等.汶川地震引发高速远程滑坡运动机理数值模拟研究:以谢家店子滑坡为例[J].地球科学与环境学报,2010,32(3):277-287. SU Sheng-rui,ZHANG Yong-shuang,LI Song,et al.Numerical Analysis on Motion Mechanism of Highspeed and Long Runout Landslide by Wenchuan Earthquake:Taking Xiejiadianzi Landslide as an Example[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2010,32(3):277-287.
[9] 辛聪聪,王运生,申 通,等.九寨沟M_s 3.2级余震薛家坝坡体地震动响应特征[J].工程地质学报,2018,26(6):1622-1630. XIN Cong-cong,WANG Yun-sheng,SHEN Tong,et al.Seismic Response of Xuejiaba Slope During the Jiu-zhaigou M_s 3.2[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2018,26(6):1622-1630.
[10] 王运生,全 清,罗永红,等.四川芦山M_s 7.0级地震的地质环境影响分析[J].地球科学与环境学报,2013,35(2):92-98. WANG Yun-sheng,QUAN Qing,LUO Yong-hong,et al.Geological Environmental Influence of Lushan M_s 7.0 Earthquake in Sichuan[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2013,35(2):92-98.
[11] 徐光兴,姚令侃,李朝红,等.边坡地震动力响应规律及地震动参数影响研究[J].岩土工程学报,2008,30(6):918-923. XU Guang-xing,YAO Ling-kan,LI Zhao-hong,et al.Dynamic Response of Slopes Under Earthquakes and Influence of Ground Motion Parameters[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2008,30(6):918-923.
[12] 刘汉香,许 强,范宣梅.地震动参数对斜坡加速度动力响应规律的影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(2):41-47. LIU Han-xiang,XU Qiang,FAN Xuan-mei.Effects of Seismic Parameters on Acceleration Responses of Slopes[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2012,32(2):41-47.
[13] 刘汉香,许 强,范宣梅,等.地震动强度对斜坡加速度动力响应规律的影响[J].岩土力学,2012,33(5):1357-1365. LIU Han-xiang,XU Qiang,FAN Xuan-mei,et al.Influence of Ground Motion Intensity on Dynamic Response Laws of Slope Accelerations[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2012,33(5):1357-1365.
[14] CELEBI M.Topographical and Geological Amplifications Determined from Strong-motion and Aftershock Records of 3 March 1985 Chile Earthquake[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1987,77(4):1147-1167.
[15] CHE A L,YANG H K,WANG B,et al.Wave Propagations Through Jointed Rock Masses and Their Effects on the Stability of Slopes[J].Engineering Geo-logy,2016,201:45-56
[16] 罗永红,王运生,王福海,等.青川县桅杆梁斜坡地震动响应监测研究[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(1):27-34. LUO Yong-hong,WANG Yun-sheng,WANG Fu-hai,et al.Monitoring of Slope Seismic Response During Aftershocks of Wenchuan Earthquake in Qingchuan County[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2010,18(1):27-34.
[17] 贺建先,王运生,罗永红,等.康定M_s 6.3级地震斜坡地震动响应监测分析[J].工程地质学报,2015,23(3):383-393. HE Jian-xian,WANG Yun-sheng,LUO Yong-hong,et al. Monitoring Result Analysis of Slope Seismic Res-ponse During the Kangding M_s 6.3 Earthquake[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2015,23(3):383-393.
[18] KHANBABAZADEH H,HADAL M E,IYISAN R.2D Seismic Response of the Duzce Basin,Turkey[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2019,DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105754.
[19] 李 伟,俞言祥,肖 亮.阿里亚斯强度衰减关系分析[J].地震学报,2017,39(6):921-929,976. LI Wei,YU Yan-xiang,XIAO Liang.Attenuation Relationship of Arias Intensity[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica,2017,39(6):921-929,976.
[20] 单振东,温瑞智,齐文浩,等.芦山地震烈度异常区的场地特征与震害相关性[J].地震工程与工程振动,2014,34(增1):232-237. SHAN Zhen-dong,WEN Rui-zhi,QI Wen-hao,et al.Implication of Abnormal Intensity Area in Lushan M_s 7.0 Earthquake[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2014,34(S1):232-237.
[21] 王荐霖,王运生,辛聪聪.九寨沟M_s 4.5级地震斜坡体及覆盖层的动响应分析[J].中国科技论文,2018,13(21):2401-2407. WANG Jian-lin,WANG Yun-sheng,XIN Cong-cong.Analysis of Slope and Overburden Seismic Response During the Jiuzhaigou M_s 4.5 Earthquake[J].China Sciencepaper,2018,13(21):2401-2407.
[22] 刘 勇,王运生,JANUSZ W.意大利诺尔恰M_s 6.2级地震震害异常原因分析[J].长江科学院院报,2018,35(9):58-62. LIU Yong,WANG Yun-sheng,JANUSZ W.Causes of Abnormal Damage of M_s 6.2 Earthquake in Norcia,Italy[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2018,35(9):58-62.
[23] 张 文,刘 勇,王运生,等.地震作用下边坡及不利地质体的动力特征[J].山地学报,2016,34(6):732-740. ZHANG Wen,LIU Yong,WANG Yun-sheng,et al.Analysis of Dynamic Characteristics of Slope and Unfavorable Geological Body Under Earthquake[J].Mountain Research,2016,34(6):732-740.
[24] 雷清雄,王运生,贺建先,等.西藏俄拉村滑坡地震动态响应失稳过程[J].山地学报,2017,35(3):332-339. LEI Qing-xiong,WANG Yun-sheng,HE Jian-xian,et al.Analysis on Failure Process and Seismic Response of Ela Village Landslide in Tibet[J].Mountain Research,2017,35(3):332-339.
[25] SUN L,XIE W.Evaluation of Pile-soil-structure Interaction Effects on the Seismic Responses of a Super Long-span Cable-stayed Bridge in the Transverse Direction:A Shaking Table Investigation[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2019,DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105577.
[26] GB 50011—2010,建筑抗震设计规范[S]. GB 50011—2010,Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S].
[27] 解全才,马 强,王丽艳,等.2017年九寨沟7.0级地震强震动记录处理与分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2018,38(5):111-119. XIE Quan-cai,MA Qiang,WANG Li-yan,et al.Data Processing and Analysis of Strong Ground Motion Records of the 2017 M_s 7.0 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dyna-mics,2018,38(5):111-119.

相似文献/References:

[1]王运生,明伟庭,刘江伟,等.丘陵地貌区斜坡强震动响应特征——以四川省长宁县为例[J].地球科学与环境学报,2020,42(04):540.[doi:10.19814/j.jese.2020.01014]
　WANG Yun-sheng,MING Wei-ting,LIU Jiang-wei,et al.Characteristics of Slope Seismic Response Under Strong Earthquake in Hilly Morphologic Area—The Case of Changning County in Sichuan Province, China[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2020,42(05):540.[doi:10.19814/j.jese.2020.01014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2019-07-05; 修回日期:2019-08-18投稿网址:http:∥jese.chd.edu.cn/
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1501000); 国家自然科学基金项目(41877235); 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(41521002)
作者简介:王运生(1960-),男,安徽潜山人,教授,博士研究生导师,工学博士,E-mail:wangys60@163.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-19